Comments for FAMVIN News

Comment on Putting the Saint Back Into Valentine’s Day by jbf

jbf — Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:36:22 +0000

Generosity Day – an effort to rebrand Valentine’s Day
http://www.bethkanter.org/generosity-day/

Comment on HHS mandate and its effect on Vincentian Family ministries by jbf

jbf — Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:15:20 +0000

A plea for compromise
http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/plea-compromise

Comment on Daybreak: A project of DePaul USA by kevin

kevin — Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:42:30 +0000

This is a great project to help others.
And the need is very important . Having
Goveronment ,Business, Churches & Organizations all pull together for a better community. I hope this program,
will always be funded & supported. And everyone have a blessed day.

Comment on Sr. Ellen Lacy, DC on current conscience issues by Widian Nicola

Widian Nicola — Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:57 +0000

Thanks, Sr. Mary Ellen! Great article!!!

Comment on BLessed Rosalie Rendu – February 7 by Georgia Hedrick

Georgia Hedrick — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:35:01 +0000

What I love about Rosalie Rendu especially is her wish that we teach the poor to better themselves, to make of themselves more than they were at present. She wasn’t just about bringing bread and soup; was about teaching them to bake and sell bread and to create and sell the soup! gh

Comment on Mea Culpa from the techie Webmaster by Georgia Hedrick

Georgia Hedrick — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:55:13 +0000

But I am still getting posts from Beth’s 2001 postings…figure that out. gh

Comment on Mea Culpa from the techie Webmaster by toma

toma — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:30:51 +0000

The horse has four legs and it doesn’t prevent him from collapse sometimes.

Comment on HHS mandate and its effect on Vincentian Family ministries by jbf

jbf — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:56:56 +0000

See LA Times “An affront Catholics agree on”
“Liberal and conservative Catholics don’t agree on much, but they’re both outraged by a new rule on contraception coverage.”
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-allen-obama-and-the-catholics-20120205,0,2263608.story

Comment on HHS mandate and its effect on Vincentian Family ministries by jbf

jbf — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:53:30 +0000

See extended comment by Sr Ellen Lacey, DC
http://famvin.org/en/2012/02/02/sr-carol-keehan-dc-something-has-to-be-fixed/#comment-5190

Comment on Sr. Carol Keehan DC “Something has to be fixed” by Sr Mary Ellen Lacy

Sr Mary Ellen Lacy — Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:41:46 +0000

On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This is a federal statute that provides for comprehensive health insurance reforms that will unfold in the next 4 years. Most deadlines for implementation of benefits are slated for 2014. The law was designed to meet the needs of the 30 million presently underinsured or uninsured citizens.
Specifically, the law
 reforms the most negative parts of the private health insurance industry;
 corrects numerous deficits in public health insurance programs;
 extends healthcare for young adults;
 ensures continued care for children regardless of long term or prior illnesses;
 balances the national medical spending against anticipated Medicare spending;
 gives broad choices to healthcare insurance consumers;
 mandates individual coverage for all Americans by 2014.
Finally, and presently the cause of much public strife, the ACA requires all employers, who choose to provide insurance for their employees, to provide insurance that covers a mandated minimum list of essential services. Under the ACA, Congress delegated the identification of the specific services to be included in the list of mandated coverage to Kathleen Sebellius and the Department of Health and Human Services.
On January 20, 2012, Kathleen Sebellius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, announced that the insurance plans provided for women by most employers must cover the cost of all FDA approved contraceptive devices with no co-pay. This includes coverage for the IUD, sterilization procedures and ella, “the morning after pill”. Churches and other places of worship would be exempt from having to cover contraception for their employees if they morally object to the practice. However, all other organizations will have to comply with the new requirement by August 2013, even if they are religiously affiliated. While the right of conscience afforded the direct care providers remains intact, the right of conscience of the sponsors of religiously affiliated organizations is categorically denied.
Pursuant to the ACA and the DHHS’ Final Rule, no healthcare institution is required to offer any medical procedures that they have previously refused to do. No form of surgical abortion must be provided or insured. That is not the concern here.
The issue is solely a right of conscience violation because it pertains to mandated insurance coverage that violates the conscience of those being forced to pay for the insurance. To bring other issues into play merely dilutes the valid argument. The “right to choose” should include the right to say no to objectionable practices. Otherwise, it is not a matter of choice.
Sr. Carol Keehan and NETWORK have strenuously called upon the Administration to reconsider this rule and its implications. We have not heard of any meetings.
The President stated at the dedication ceremony of the new statue of Martin Luther King that, “Progress did not happen with oratory alone”. He called upon the nation to promote further progress with action. In this, he was correct.
Our responsibility to the poor includes deliver y of service in a moral, life giving manner. The conversation at the water fountain or the grocery store will not cause change. No, progress will not happen with oratory alone. Own it. Everyone needs to tell /write President Obama and Kathleen Sebellius that we oppose this. I implore all readers to write the President, The Secretary of DHHS as well as your legislators. Write of your opposition to your local newspapers. Get your college kids to light up the internet and e-blast the White House with their objections to this regulation.
Ask the DHHS to engage in an open discourse regarding the seemingly unanticipated consequences of this deprivation of the right of conscience of religious persons who own, operate and/or sponsor institutions of higher education, healthcare and social work.
This is not about abortion – it is about eviscerating our right to conscience. It is a slippery slope – today we pay for abortifacients and sterilizations, tomorrow we may pay for other procedures that are a little further down this bad path. The ACA is a fabulous piece of legislation for the poor …..until it crosses this line.
The line in the sand must be drawn here and now.